<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sociological Theory // I Heart Sociology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com</link>
	<description>Danielle Dirks, PhD // Department of Sociology // Occidental College // Los Angeles, CA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 05:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey Arnold! : A Primer on Racial and Other Popular Stereotypes (The Trenchcoat Mafia’s Project on Cartoons and Social Theory) by Ankh</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/11/28/hey-arnold-a-primer-on-racial-and-other-popular-stereotypes-part-of-the-trenchcoat-mafias-group-project-on-cartoons/#comment-5931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2221#comment-5931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I second that. People are only seeing what they want to see and trying to make excuses to cover up the truth. This world is corrupt and as scary as it may sound, it&#039;s all to real. But go ahead, fall in line like the rest of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that. People are only seeing what they want to see and trying to make excuses to cover up the truth. This world is corrupt and as scary as it may sound, it&#8217;s all to real. But go ahead, fall in line like the rest of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are the Wealthy Happier? by Ashenafi Mebratu</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/09/23/are-the-wealthy-happier/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashenafi Mebratu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=212#comment-5841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sociologically speaking happiness is socially constructed! Mere   
economic accumulation is not just the only track to happiness unless it welcomed other life spices!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sociologically speaking happiness is socially constructed! Mere<br />
economic accumulation is not just the only track to happiness unless it welcomed other life spices!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey Arnold! : A Primer on Racial and Other Popular Stereotypes (The Trenchcoat Mafia’s Project on Cartoons and Social Theory) by JACK</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/11/28/hey-arnold-a-primer-on-racial-and-other-popular-stereotypes-part-of-the-trenchcoat-mafias-group-project-on-cartoons/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>JACK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 01:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2221#comment-5794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOURE overanalyzing dude.  Nobody cares about race.  Just Watch the cartoon and laugh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOURE overanalyzing dude.  Nobody cares about race.  Just Watch the cartoon and laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Stigma Attached to Having Tattoos: Being Labeled as &#8220;Deviant&#8221; by Tyson Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/10/29/the-stigma-attached-to-having-tattoos-being-labeled-as-deviant/#comment-5739</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=1292#comment-5739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You seem to want to confine tattoos to one particular expressive role. Why should they conform to this limitation? The role you mention doesn&#039;t even seem to be predominant, though I&#039;m sure it does play a part in some instances (I&#039;m thinking for instance of those &quot;teardrop&quot; tattoos). If anything your post seems more relevatory of your own class biases than anything. 

I see four primary functions of tattoos: signs of group affiliation, signs of status/power, signs of sexual prowess/availability, and signs of individial expression/differentiation. You would expect something no less affirming from permanent emblem voluntarily etched by so many. For my part, I have to confess, my own reaction to the image you chose is closer to fear than contempt. I see it as a sign of group(gang) affiliation and status/power rather than deviance and inferiority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to want to confine tattoos to one particular expressive role. Why should they conform to this limitation? The role you mention doesn&#8217;t even seem to be predominant, though I&#8217;m sure it does play a part in some instances (I&#8217;m thinking for instance of those &#8220;teardrop&#8221; tattoos). If anything your post seems more relevatory of your own class biases than anything. </p>
<p>I see four primary functions of tattoos: signs of group affiliation, signs of status/power, signs of sexual prowess/availability, and signs of individial expression/differentiation. You would expect something no less affirming from permanent emblem voluntarily etched by so many. For my part, I have to confess, my own reaction to the image you chose is closer to fear than contempt. I see it as a sign of group(gang) affiliation and status/power rather than deviance and inferiority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Implications of Hair Product Segregation by Kate</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/11/28/the-implications-of-hair-product-segregation/#comment-5630</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2209#comment-5630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if &#039;ethnic&#039; people only shop from that section, but I do. And I&#039;m as white as you can be without being transparent.

I find it insulting that it&#039;s assumed ONLY ethnic persons could possibly have curly, dry hair. Why must I purchase chemicals that destroy my hair&#039;s natural texture, while products that are actually designed to work with natural curls are marketed only to &#039;ethnic&#039; people?

And what the heck does that word mean, anyway? I&#039;m ethnic. Ethnically German. So, I guess that means it&#039;s my section, too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if &#8216;ethnic&#8217; people only shop from that section, but I do. And I&#8217;m as white as you can be without being transparent.</p>
<p>I find it insulting that it&#8217;s assumed ONLY ethnic persons could possibly have curly, dry hair. Why must I purchase chemicals that destroy my hair&#8217;s natural texture, while products that are actually designed to work with natural curls are marketed only to &#8216;ethnic&#8217; people?</p>
<p>And what the heck does that word mean, anyway? I&#8217;m ethnic. Ethnically German. So, I guess that means it&#8217;s my section, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Implications of Hair Product Segregation by Justin</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/11/28/the-implications-of-hair-product-segregation/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2209#comment-4235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do black people only use shampoo from that section ? Seems like there would be more brands if 20% of the population had to shop in the ethnic section]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do black people only use shampoo from that section ? Seems like there would be more brands if 20% of the population had to shop in the ethnic section</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strikingly Different Interpretation of Beauty by beam</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/10/27/strikingly-different-interpretation-of-beauty/#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator>beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=1136#comment-3921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gap teeth is so ugly and ridiculous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gap teeth is so ugly and ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gender Stereotypes and Over-Sexualization of Women in Comic Books by God-leros</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/12/01/gender-stereotypes-and-over-sexualization-of-women-in-comic-books/#comment-3750</link>
		<dc:creator>God-leros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2435#comment-3750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.
What a bunch of self-righteous BS.
These are comics. There is no different treatment of the men.

Everything a woman would want from men: idealized.
Over sexualized, perfect physiques, absolute confidence, coming to aid, kindness.
Revealing outfits ... and yes: tough and strong.

Grow up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.<br />
What a bunch of self-righteous BS.<br />
These are comics. There is no different treatment of the men.</p>
<p>Everything a woman would want from men: idealized.<br />
Over sexualized, perfect physiques, absolute confidence, coming to aid, kindness.<br />
Revealing outfits &#8230; and yes: tough and strong.</p>
<p>Grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Discourse Behind Rape by Emily Monaghan</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/12/04/the-discourse-behind-rape/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Monaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=2868#comment-3748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to Jesse...
As much as this response made me shake my head; I will respond with graciousness (or my personal interpretation of what graciousness is, respectively). 

&quot;The reference that feminists use to ‘blaming the victim’ as being an unacceptable dismisses the reality of false rape accusations. The more blame you place completely on the male, the more you blur the lines of what constitutes as rape and what doesn’t.&quot; 

Firstly, I would like to begin with stating the fact that if a woman feels she has been raped; that is her perogitive to express. And for these so called &#039;false rape accusations&#039; I&#039;m sure their existence is minor. This argument is redundant and idiotic, quite frankly. Why should we be focusing on &#039;false rape accusations&#039; when there is a gamut of issues which deals with RAPE; i.e rape culture and blatant violence towards women. 

&quot;Realizing rape culture, to a feminists, is accepting that those two events stem from the same patriarchal mentality&quot; 

Rape culture itself has been cultivated primarily by heterosexual males; and the assumption (more so realization) that this ideology stems from patriarchal mentality is completely valid. The ideology surrounding  hegemonic masculinity is deeply rooted in patriarchal norms, as men are perceived (and claim to...) be dominant over women. 

To elaborate on the original post; which I agree with entirely (wonderful post!)
It&#039;s difficult for me to discuss victim blaming as it angers me so deeply. The equivocation of victim blaming translates to &quot;women should change their behavior to avoid getting raped&quot;. Rather than focusing on the fundamental issue at hand, which is the RAPIST. There have been many approaches such as the modest approach vs the hypersexualized approach. Both define female sexuality by how it relates to the male gaze. In both cases women&#039;s bodies are seen an instrument to be kept hidden or displayed. By targeting women as instigating components of rape; is absurd. We need to send the message that WOMEN&#039;S BODIES belong to women. Whether a woman is dressed with her body covered or displayed, it is not an invitation for rape. We must shift the paradigm in order to liberate ourselves (women). We need to send the message that; this is my body and it belongs to me; you may not violate my body no matter how I dress myself, how I speak, how I behave etc. We need the legislative bodies TO COOPORATE and stop allowing patriarchy to rule the judicial system. 

As for male survivors of sexual assault; we must move away from the stereotypes surrounding hegemonic masculinity, i.e men are immune to victimization, men should be able to fight off attacks, men shouldn&#039;t express emotion etc.) We need to offer support to male victims in order to dissolve the stigma surrounding male behaviorism. (I hope this helps)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Jesse&#8230;<br />
As much as this response made me shake my head; I will respond with graciousness (or my personal interpretation of what graciousness is, respectively). </p>
<p>&#8220;The reference that feminists use to ‘blaming the victim’ as being an unacceptable dismisses the reality of false rape accusations. The more blame you place completely on the male, the more you blur the lines of what constitutes as rape and what doesn’t.&#8221; </p>
<p>Firstly, I would like to begin with stating the fact that if a woman feels she has been raped; that is her perogitive to express. And for these so called &#8216;false rape accusations&#8217; I&#8217;m sure their existence is minor. This argument is redundant and idiotic, quite frankly. Why should we be focusing on &#8216;false rape accusations&#8217; when there is a gamut of issues which deals with RAPE; i.e rape culture and blatant violence towards women. </p>
<p>&#8220;Realizing rape culture, to a feminists, is accepting that those two events stem from the same patriarchal mentality&#8221; </p>
<p>Rape culture itself has been cultivated primarily by heterosexual males; and the assumption (more so realization) that this ideology stems from patriarchal mentality is completely valid. The ideology surrounding  hegemonic masculinity is deeply rooted in patriarchal norms, as men are perceived (and claim to&#8230;) be dominant over women. </p>
<p>To elaborate on the original post; which I agree with entirely (wonderful post!)<br />
It&#8217;s difficult for me to discuss victim blaming as it angers me so deeply. The equivocation of victim blaming translates to &#8220;women should change their behavior to avoid getting raped&#8221;. Rather than focusing on the fundamental issue at hand, which is the RAPIST. There have been many approaches such as the modest approach vs the hypersexualized approach. Both define female sexuality by how it relates to the male gaze. In both cases women&#8217;s bodies are seen an instrument to be kept hidden or displayed. By targeting women as instigating components of rape; is absurd. We need to send the message that WOMEN&#8217;S BODIES belong to women. Whether a woman is dressed with her body covered or displayed, it is not an invitation for rape. We must shift the paradigm in order to liberate ourselves (women). We need to send the message that; this is my body and it belongs to me; you may not violate my body no matter how I dress myself, how I speak, how I behave etc. We need the legislative bodies TO COOPORATE and stop allowing patriarchy to rule the judicial system. </p>
<p>As for male survivors of sexual assault; we must move away from the stereotypes surrounding hegemonic masculinity, i.e men are immune to victimization, men should be able to fight off attacks, men shouldn&#8217;t express emotion etc.) We need to offer support to male victims in order to dissolve the stigma surrounding male behaviorism. (I hope this helps)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Racism in Pocahontas by Jekla</title>
		<link>http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/2011/10/26/racism-in-pocahontas/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jekla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soctheory.iheartsociology.com/?p=1122#comment-2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You people don&#039;t understa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people don&#8217;t understa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
